Our services
We help law firms decide where AI is worth using, set up the tools and train the team. The aim is to save time and reduce costs on work your firm does every day.
Getting started
If you’re unsure where to begin, we can review how your firm works and recommend the first steps. If you already have a project in mind, we can help you deliver it.
Three ways to work with us
Each engagement has an agreed scope, timetable and fee. You can start with one task and build from there.
Work out which tasks AI could help with and what implementation would involve. Get a plan that covers the first project and wider use across the business.
Best for: Firms exploring AI or deciding where to focus.
Discuss a review
Put a tool into use for a specific task, such as preparing document summaries or passing information between systems.
Best for: Firms with a specific task or project to deliver.
Discuss a project
Help your staff use the tools for their own work, write better prompts and check the results.
Best for: Teams introducing AI or improving how they use it.
Discuss team supportScope and fees
We agree the work, deliverables and fees before implementation begins, including any proposed software costs.
Fees are quoted individually, based on your priorities, existing systems and the support required.
Your proposal will set out the work, timetable and fees, so you can decide whether to go ahead.
Find the work that’s worth improving first.
We ask your team to walk us through the work, including repeated tasks, delays and the software they use. We look at where AI could help and what would need to change. You’ll receive a plan for introducing it across the business, starting with the tasks most likely to justify the time and cost. The plan includes the support your staff will need.
Choose tools against the job they need to do.
We compare tools using your requirements: what they can do, how they handle information, who can access it and whether they connect to your systems. We also check the features included in your existing licences. Before wider rollout, we can agree a small pilot and decide how to measure its results.
Get the tools working with your systems.
My team and I can configure the tools, test them and support rollout. Where the software allows it, we can connect them to your document and case-management systems. We involve the people doing the work, document the process and agree where someone needs to check the output.
Cut down on repeated admin and manual handovers.
Copying information between systems and chasing routine updates can take time that adds little value. We map the process and work out which steps can be automated. Some tasks suit AI; others need a straightforward automation. We also define what happens when information is missing or the result needs someone’s attention.
Teach people how to use the tools for their work.
Training uses tasks relevant to solicitors, support staff and managers. We cover what the tool can do, what information is suitable to use and how to write a useful prompt. Your team practises checking sources, spotting unsupported answers and deciding when a result needs further work.
Work through an example, compare the answer with its sources and discuss what needs to be checked.
Get help after the tools are in use.
We can troubleshoot problems, answer questions and review how the tools are being used. We look at staff feedback alongside the time spent preparing and checking work, the quality of the output and running costs. That gives you a basis for deciding what to change, extend or stop.
Examples of tasks we can help with
These are starting points for a discussion. We’d test the approach against your documents, systems and review requirements.
Extract dates, names and key passages, or prepare a first summary for a solicitor to check against the original documents.
Turn suitable documents into a draft timeline, with source references and flags for gaps or conflicting accounts.
Prepare a first draft of routine correspondence using approved source material. The responsible professional checks and approves it.
Make approved precedents and internal guidance easier to search, with access controls and links to the original material.
Collect initial information and pass it to the right people or systems, reducing repeated entry where integrations are available.
Bring information together for internal reports, follow-up lists and updates, so staff spend less time assembling them by hand.
Time and cost
We help you answer that before committing to a wider rollout. The calculation needs to include licences, setup, training and checking the output.
Use tools for suitable preparation and admin tasks, giving your team more time for the parts that need their expertise.
Check your existing subscriptions for unused features or overlap before buying another product.
Compare pilot results with your current process. Time released can be valuable, but it isn’t automatically a reduction in spending.
What happens next
Walk through the task with your team and record the tools, time and problems involved.
Agree the work, fees and review points, including how we’ll assess the time, cost and quality of the result.
Set up the tools and test them with representative tasks. Work through the results with the people using them.
Train your team and hand over the working guidance. Agree what support you need after rollout.
Straightforward answers
The cost depends on the workflows, tools and support involved. We agree the scope, deliverables and fees before work starts. The business case also needs to account for licences, integration, training and the time required to review outputs.
We review your existing software and licences before recommending additional products. Whether a tool is suitable depends on its capabilities, information handling, access controls and supported integrations.
Yes. A pilot around one task is often a useful start. We record how it’s done now, test the proposed approach and compare the full time, cost and quality of the work.
You don’t need an in-house AI team. We’ll work with your staff and coordinate with your IT support where system access or integration is needed.
It can help reduce repetitive processing or avoid overlapping software costs, but the result depends on the task and the full cost of the solution. We distinguish time released from a reduction in actual spend and use pilot results to assess the value.
Yes. We work with UK firms of all sizes. The scope depends on what you need, the systems you use and the resources you have.
Fictional workflow illustration
An example of how a document task could be organised. This is a fictional illustration, not a client case study or a measured result.
The task
A fictional dispute file contains an agreement, correspondence and delivery records. The team wants a draft timeline that separates the parties’ accounts and links each event to its source.
An email sent on 12 April reports delivery on 10 April. A later letter disputes whether delivery was complete. The output needs to preserve those distinctions, rather than treating every document date or assertion as an established event.
Identify the documents in scope, check they are readable and select an appropriate tool. Initial testing uses the fictional file.
Request an event date, description, document reference and separate note for uncertainty. Ask the tool to flag conflicting accounts and missing information.
The reviewer verifies dates and references, checks omissions and separates reported facts from allegations. Unsupported entries are corrected or left unresolved.
The responsible professional decides how the reviewed chronology can be used. AI organises a draft; it does not determine the merits or the next legal step.
The potential business value: less repeated sorting and a more consistent draft to review. A pilot would compare the complete task, including preparation and checking, with the firm’s existing process before any time or cost saving is claimed.
Discuss a litigation workflow
Training includes the review
We show your team how to check the output against the documents, spot unsupported statements and record anything that needs a closer look.
Try our fictional examples to see how a prompt can ask for source references and flag missing information.
See the prompt examplesTalk to Atif
Tell us which tasks take too much time or where your team gets stuck. We’ll discuss whether AI could help and what it would take to introduce it.
Arrange a discovery call